One thought on “ES-07.19_Falling-Cost-Of-Solar

  1. Brent

    Bad graph design. Trimming the axis to start at 2.50 instead of 0 means the difference in the costs are exaggerated. You may not be biased, but your graph is. It’s biased to make it look, visually, like the cost is now about 75% less of what it was before, but it is only 20% less.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *