There are a number of financial incentives offered to property owners going solar. From rebates to tax incentives and net metering policies, there are many policies that bring down the cost of installing solar panels on your house. One such policy is the feed-in tariff, which, when designed properly, can provide substantial financial benefits to solar customers.
What do feed-in tariffs mean for you
Feed-in tariffs are relatively rare as a solar policy mechanism in the US. Only seven states have offered solar feed-in tariffs, according to the Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency. As such, if you’re a property owner who is considering or has already invested in solar, it is unlikely that a feed-in tariff mechanism impacts the economics of your system. However, feed-in tariffs remain a useful policy tool that can augment the economics of going solar by adding to other solar incentives.
How feed-in tariffs work
In order to meet renewable energy goals, federal, state and local governments have all provided financial incentives to boost the economic case to invest in renewable energy. These incentive policies are an opportunity for a government (or electric utility) to focus on a specific public policy goal, such as installing a greater capacity of solar energy or developing and deploying a local green-collar workforce. One such policy mechanism is the feed-in tariff, which has long been a popular policy device throughout the world.
Feed-in tariffs are designed to provide a fixed-price incentive to guarantee a certain level of benefit for each unit of electricity produced by your solar panels over a long-term contract, typically 10 to 20 years. Though not as popular of a policy mechanism in the United States, feed-in tariffs have long played a role in driving renewable energy growth throughout the rest of the world, specifically in Europe, where countries like Germany have effectively deployed feed-in tariffs to expand the renewable energy sector substantially. The stability afforded by a long-term, fixed-price contract sends a clear signal to developers that installing a certain type of generating resources is a priority.
Typically, the financial incentives in a feed-in tariff are structured one of a few key ways. First and foremost, feed-in tariffs are designed to guarantee payment at above the cost of purchasing electricity from the grid. To do so, a feed-in tariff will likely compensate a renewable energy system either at a predetermined level representative of the value it provides to society or at the all-in cost of the system, levelized over the length of the contract and with a revenue margin built in, according to a seminal report on the policy mechanism by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
In Europe, feed-in tariffs have been used as a primary or exclusive policy mechanism to drive renewable energy deployment. In contrast, feed-in tariffs in the United States are more often used in conjunction with other solar incentives, designed as a sort of added price benefit beyond the other financial incentives that exist for property owners investing in solar.
Solar incentives at a glance
Perhaps the best-known solar incentive is the federal solar investment tax credit (ITC), which allows a solar customer to reduce their annual income tax by 30% of the cost of their solar system during the tax year that it’s installed. First introduced in 2006, and renewed most recently in 2015, the congressionally-passed ITC has played a commendable role in the growth of the solar industry as it has coincided with 60 percent annual growth in solar, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).
The ITC is hardly alone in terms of solar incentives. One of the most popular mechanisms to financially incentivize solar is a policy called “net metering”. At its core, net metering is a performance incentive that results in your electric consumption being measured as the net of your overall monthly consumption and the monthly output from your solar panels. In some cases, net metering policies actually pay a higher rate for the electricity produced from your solar panel system than you pay to purchase electricity from the grid. In other cases, net metering policies allow you to avoid both the supply charge (i.e., the portion of your bill tied to actually generating electricity) and the transmission and distribution charge (i.e., the portion of your bill tied to getting that electricity to your appliances).
All of these policies are designed to help meet public policy goals or targets, such as a state-specific renewable portfolio standard (RPS), which mandates that a state must generate or procure a certain amount of its electricity usage from renewable energy by a certain year.
Feed-in tariffs vs. other solar incentives
The key difference between feed-in tariffs and other solar incentives, such as the ITC, is that feed-in tariffs are a production-based incentive. In other words, where a policy mechanism such as the ITC is based upon the amount of money you invest in your solar energy system, a feed-in tariff compensates you based upon how much electricity that system generates.
This is an important distinction for solar specifically for a few main reasons. First, as the cost of solar panels continues to decline, an investment-based incentive will possibly pay less of a benefit, as it now costs less to build a 6-kilowatt system than it did a year ago. Second, some of the most successful state-policies to deploy renewable energy have already employed production-based incentives. And third, the combination of a production-based incentive with an investment-based incentive can lead to exceedingly quick payback periods for investing in solar.
Take advantage of solar incentives
To take advantage of the solar incentives available in your area, register for the EnergySage Marketplace to receive up to seven free quotes from local, pre-screened solar installers. The quotes take into consideration performance-based incentives, tax credits, and rebates. With all of those incentives included, the average payback period for a solar panel system is under eight years nationally.